Tourism, Modernisation and Cultural Loss at the Brikama Craft Market in The Gambia, Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25120/etropic.25.2.2026.4266Keywords:
Tristes Tropiques, cultural commodification, craft heritage, tourism-driven modernisation, tourism ethnography, The Gambia, Tropical AfricaAbstract
Taking the Brikama Craft Market in The Gambia as its ethnographic field study, this paper examines a contemporary African manifestation of the “sad tropics” that Lévi-Strauss lamented: a once-authentic site of cultural production and sociality that is being rapidly altered by state-led modernisation and tourism-development initiatives. The recent relocation of the market to a purpose-built “modern” complex, intended to make it more attractive to international tourists, has paradoxically eroded its lived authenticity, displaced long-established artisans, and accelerated the commodification and standardisation of traditional crafts. Through this Gambian example, the study illustrates how the global tourism-modernity nexus continues to produce new “tristes tropiques” in the 21st century: spaces where economic “progress” and the tourist gaze jointly contribute to cultural loss, even as they promise development and visibility. The research, conducted through qualitative interviews with market stakeholders, uncovers a dual reality: infrastructural enhancements present possible economic advantages but also threaten to commodify cultural assets and marginalise traditional craftspeople. Modernisation theory was employed to evaluate these dynamics, emphasising the conflicts between advancement and conservation. The results emphasized the necessity of a culturally attuned approach to development. The Brikama Craft Market, notwithstanding its difficulties, persists as a vibrant repository of Gambian identity and creativity.
References
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2022). Non-modernization: Power–culture trajectories and the dynamics of political institutions. Annual Review of Political Science, 25(1), 323-339. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-103913
Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J. A., and Business, C. (2013). Why Nations fail-the origins of power, prosperity and poverty. ld Econo, 2, 118-121. https://doi.org/10.1355/ae29-2j
Adams, J. (2020). Artisanship in West Africa: Cultural Expression and Economic Realities. Journal of Cultural Studies, 15(2), 45-67.
Asare, A. D. (2022). Arts management and cultural policy in Ghana. In Arts management, cultural policy, and the African diaspora (pp. 29-50). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85810-0_3
Baptista, J. A. (2022). The good holiday: Development, tourism and the politics of benevolence in Mozambique. Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781785335471
Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel Optimism Durham, Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822394716
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_3470-2
Brown, P., & Green, S. (2021). Economic Challenges in Traditional Craft Markets: A Comparative Analysis. African Economic Review, 9(3), 112-128.
Bunten, A. C. (2010). More like ourselves: Indigenous capitalism through tourism. American Indian Quarterly, 34(3), 285-311. https://doi.org/10.5250/amerindiquar.34.3.285
Chew, S., & Lauderdale, P. (Eds.). (2010). Theory and methodology of world development: The writings of Andre Gunder Frank. Springer.
Cole, S. (2007). Beyond authenticity and commodification. Annals of tourism research, 34(4), 943-960.
ColloredoMansfeld, R. (2002). An ethnography of neoliberalism: understanding competition in artisan economies. Current Anthropology, 43(1), 113-137.
Comaroff, J. L., & Comaroff, J. (2009). Ethnicity, Inc. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226114736.001.0001
Conklin, B. A., & Graham, L. R. (1995). The shifting middle ground: Amazonian Indians and eco‐politics. American anthropologist, 97(4), 695-710.
Crouch, M., & McKenzie, H. (2006). The logic of small samples in interview-based qualitative research. Social science information, 45(4), 483-499.
Dieke, P. U. (1994). The political economy of tourism in The Gambia. Review of African Political Economy, 21(62), 611-626.
Din, T. M. U. (2014). Handicraft production and employment in Indian: an economic analysis. Global Journal of Human-Social Science:(E), 14(4), 27-31.
Ebron, P. A. (1999). Tourists as pilgrims: commercial fashioning of transatlantic politics. American Ethnologist, 26(4), 910-932.
Escobar, A. (2011). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400839926
Ferguson, J. (2006). Global shadows: Africa in the neoliberal world order. Duke University Press.
Frank, A. G. (1967). Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin America (Vol. 93). NYU Press.
Geertz, C. (1973). Chapter 1. Thick Description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays, 3-30.
Goodwin‐Hawkins, B. (2019). Theodossopoulos, Dimitrios. 2016. Exoticisation undressed: ethnographic nostalgia and authenticity in Emberá clothes. Manchester University Press.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field methods, 18(1), 59-82.
Hemmler, K. S., Camara, B., & Buerkert, A. (2025). Social ecology of artisanal sand mining in the Niger River around Bamako, Mali. PloS one, 20(1), e0318029.
Hitchcock, M. (2002). Zanzibar Stone Town joins the imagined community of world heritage sites. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 8(2), 153-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250220143931
Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American sociological review, 65(1), 19-51.
Inkeles, A. (1975). Becoming modern: Individual change in six developing countries. Ethos, 3(2), 323-342.
Knöbl, W. (2003). Theories that won’t pass away: The never-ending story. Handbook of historical sociology, 96-107.
Lévi-Strauss, C., Weightman, J., & Weightman, D. (1955). Tristes tropiques (Vol. 504). Paris: Plon.
Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy1. American political science review, 53(1), 69-105.
Lipset, S. M. (2018). Values, education, and entrepreneurship. In Promise of development (pp. 39-75). Routledge.
Little, W. E. (2004). Mayas in the marketplace: Tourism, globalization, and cultural identity. University of Texas Press.
MacCannell, D. (1973). Staged authenticity: Arrangements of social space in tourist settings. American journal of Sociology, 79(3), 589-603. https://doi.org/10.1086/225585
Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family practice, 13(6), 522-526.
Munck, G. L. (2018). Modernization Theory as a Case of Failed Knowledge Production. Annals of Comparative Democratization, 16(3), 37-41.
Otoo, M., Ibro, G., Fulton, J., & Lowenberg-Deboer, J. (2012). Micro-entrepreneurship in Niger: Factors affecting the success of women street food vendors. Journal of African Business, 13(1), 16-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2012.657937
Przeworski, A., & Limongi, F. (1997). Modernization: Theories and facts. World politics, 49(2), 155-183.
Radoine, H. (2019). Conservation-based cultural, environmental, and economic development: The case of the walled city of Fez. In The Human Sustainable City (pp. 457-477). Routledge.
Rahnema, M. (2003). Quand la misère chasse la pauvreté; essai.
Ramos, A. R. (2012). The politics of perspectivism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41(1), 481-494.
Rostow, W. W. (2013). The stages of economic growth. In Sociological Worlds (pp. 130-134). Routledge.
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., ... & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality and quantity, 52(4), 1893-1907.
Sharpley, R. (2013). Tourism and development challenges in the least developed countries: the case of The Gambia. In Tourism and the Millennium Development Goals (pp. 43-64). Routledge.
Shepherd, R. (2002). Commodification, culture and tourism. Tourist studies, 2(2), 183-201.
Sinamai, A. (2022). Ivhu rinotsamwa: Landscape Memory and Cultural Landscapes in Zimbabwe and Tropical Africa. eTropic: electronic journal of studies in the Tropics, 21(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.25120/etropic.21.1.2022.3836
Skocpol, T. (1977). Wallerstein's world capitalist system: a theoretical and historical critique.
Smith, A. (2018). The Role of Craft Markets in Cultural Preservation. Cultural Heritage Journal, 22(1), 78-94.
Stobart, J., van Damme, I., Beeckmans, L., & Bigon, L. (2016). The making of the central markets of Dakar and Kinshasa: from colonial origins to the post-colonial period. Urban History, 43(3).
Telfer, D. J., & Sharpley, R. (2015). Tourism and development in the developing world. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315686196
Thompson, C., O'Hare, G., & Evans, K. (1995). Tourism in The Gambia: problems and proposals. Tourism Management, 16(8), 571-581.
Tipps, D. C. (1973). Modernization theory and the comparative study of national societies: A critical perspective. Comparative studies in society and history, 15(2), 199-226.
Treisman, D. (2020). Economic development and democracy: Predispositions and triggers. Annual Review of Political Science, 23(1), 241-257.
Verick, S. (2006). The impact of globalization on the informal sector in Africa. Economic and Social Policy Division, United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (ECA) and Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), 26.
Wallerstein, I. (1993). The Modern World System. Social Theory: The Multicultural and Classic Readings, 427.
Yin, R. K. (2016). Qualitative Research Methods. SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 CC-BY

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit articles to this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors are responsible for ensuring that any material that has influenced the research or writing has been properly cited and credited both in the text and in the Reference List (Bibliography). Contributors are responsible for gaining copyright clearance on figures, photographs or lengthy quotes used in their manuscript that have been published elsewhere.
2. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, or publish it in a book), with proper acknowledgement of the work's initial publication in this journal.
4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access or The Open Access Citation Advantage). Where authors include such a work in an institutional repository or on their website (i.e., a copy of a work which has been published in eTropic, or a pre-print or post-print version of that work), we request that they include a statement that acknowledges the eTropic publication including the name of the journal, the volume number and a web-link to the journal item.
5. Authors should be aware that the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License permits readers to share (copy and redistribute the work in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the work) for any purpose, even commercially, provided they also give appropriate credit to the work, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. They may do these things in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests you or your publisher endorses their use.