A Semiotic Critique of Neocolonial Visual Identity Branding in Seychelles Tourism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25120/etropic.25.2.2026.4273Keywords:
Semiotics of tourism, Seychelles, destination branding, neocolonial imagery, visual identity, tropical island tourism, tourism brandingAbstract
Seychelles’ tourism branding, framed globally as a tropical island paradise, mobilises visual signs that risk reproducing a neocolonial imaginary of a “paradise without people.” While destination branding research has focused on strategy and image outcomes, less attention has been paid to the semiotic function of visual identity and its interpretation by diverse audiences. This study adopts a semiotic perspective to examine how four groups: local residents, tourists, designers, and a general audience, interpret the visual identity of Seychelles tourism branding through a single official promotional image. Using a survey-based design, participants evaluated a stimulus poster drawn from the Seychelles’ official Brand Guidelines (2022). Analysis covers meaning–making through logos, typography, colour, photography, composition, and people–nature content. Findings show that photography and colour dominated attention, with green and blue powerfully signifying nature and environmental purity. The slogan “Another World” achieved strong recall despite its typographic execution disrupting readability. Crucially, interpretations of the brochure diverged: tourists associated authenticity with pristine, people-free landscapes, while local residents sought cultural presence and everyday Seychellois representation. This study reveals the visual imaginaries through which different audiences interpret the same image, demonstrating how tropical tourism visuals mediate neocolonial, environmental, and cultural meanings.
References
Adamus-Matuszyńska, A., Dzik, P., Michnik, J., & Polok, G. (2021). Visual component of destination brands as a tool for communicating sustainable tourism offers. Sustainability, 13(2), 731. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020731
Anholt, S. (2007). Competitive Identity and Development. In Competitive Identity: The New Brand Management for Nations, Cities and Regions (pp. 113-128). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies. Hill and Wang.
Bonarou, C. (2021). The poetics of travel through unravelling visual representations on postcards: A critical semiotics analysis. Journal of Tourism, Heritage & Services Marketing, 7(1), 44-53.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Can, A. S., Ekinci, Y., & Pino, G. (2024). Examining the impact of joint brand advertising on perceived destination brand authenticity. International Journal of Advertising, 44(5), 861–885. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2024.2432237
Chen, R., Zhou, Z., Zhan, G., & Zhou, N. (2020). The impact of destination brand authenticity and destination brand self-congruence on tourist loyalty: The mediating role of destination brand engagement. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 15, 100402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2019.100402
Culler, J. (1981). Semiotics of tourism. American Journal of Semiotics, 1(1–2), 127–140.
Dann, G. (1996). The language of tourism. CAB International.
Dinnie, K. (2015). Nation Branding: Concepts, Issues, Practice (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315773612
Dong, Y., Li, Y., Hua, H., & Li, W. (2023). Perceived tourism authenticity on social media: The consistency of ethnic destination endorsers. Tourism Management Perspectives, 45, 101176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2023.101176
Fang, B., & Xiang, Z. (2023). Visual deception in tourism marketing: Effects on trust and tourist experience. Tourism Management Perspectives, 44, 101158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2023.101158
Kladou, S., Kavaratzis, M., Rigopoulou, I., & Salonika, E. (2017). The role of brand elements in destination branding. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 6(4), 426–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2016.06.011
Kumar, V., Kaushal, V., & Kaushik, A. (2022). Building relationship orientation among travellers through destination brand authenticity. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 29(3), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/13567667221095589
Liang, L. & Cheong, C. (2025). Brand identity construction through the heritage of Chinese destination logos. Semiotica, 2025 (263), 241–277. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2023-0138
Lu, L., Chi, C. G., & Liu, Y. (2015). Authenticity, involvement, and image: Evaluating tourist experiences at historic districts. Tourism Management, 50, 85-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.01.026
Lundberg, A., Regis, H., & Agbonifo, J. (2022). Tropical Landscapes and Nature-Culture Entanglements: Reading Tropicality via Avatar. eTropic 21, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.25120/etropic.21.1.2022.3877
Marine-Roig, E. (2015). Identity and authenticity in destination image construction. Anatolia, 26(4), 574–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/13032917.2015.1040814
McEwen, D., & Bennett, O. (2010). Seychelles tourism value chain analysis. Final Report Commonwealth Secretariat.
Morgan, N. J., Pritchard, A. (2007). Meeting the destination branding challenge. In Destination Branding, 73–92. Routledge.
Naghizadeh, R. (2021). Semiotic analysis in tourism. Journal of Tourism & Sports Management, 4(2), 415-422.
Prawira, N. G., Jeon, J. O., Prawira, M. F. A., Prawira, A. B. A., & Prawira, M. P. (2024). Bridging Cultures Through Brands: Exploring the Role of Cultural Authenticity and Identity Alignment in Shaping Revisit Intention. Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Travel Management, 2(2), 103-115.
Sawyer, B. D., Finomore, V. S., Calvo, A. A., & Hancock, P. A. (2020). The legibility of different font types in short-exposure contexts. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 141, 102429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102429
Sophola, T. G., & Dharmalingam, U. K. (2025, January). Enhancing Seychelles’ Brand Identity: A Toolkit Approach. In International Conference on Research into Design (pp. 77–89). Springer Nature Singapore.
Stepchenkova, S., & Mills, J. E. (2010). Destination Image: A Meta-Analysis of 2000–2007 research. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 19(6), 575–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2010.493071
Shi, H., Liu, Y., Kumail, T., & Pan, L. (2022). Tourism destination brand equity, brand authenticity and revisit intention: The mediating role of tourist satisfaction and the moderating role of destination familiarity. Tourism Review, 77(3), 735–753. https://doi.org/10.1108/tr-08-2021-0371
Urry, J., & Larsen, J. (2011). The tourist gaze 3.0. Sage.
Union. (n.d.). Paradise revisited [Case study]. Union. Retrieved September 09, 2025, from https://www.union.co.uk/case-studies/paradise-revisited
Wang, Y., Jiang, J., Gong, X., & Wang, J. (2023). Simple = Authentic: The effect of visually simple package design on perceived brand authenticity and brand choice. Journal of Business Research, 158, 114078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114078
Yang, F., Zhang, J., & Xu, H. (2023). Perceived authenticity and ecotourist behavior: Evidence from survey-based analysis. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 31(6), 1234–1256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2023.2197084
Zheng, Y., Wang, Q., & Li, X. (2023). Linking perceived authenticity to sustainable tourism development: Evidence from survey-based modeling. Tourism Management, 93, 104617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104617
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 CC-BY
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit articles to this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors are responsible for ensuring that any material that has influenced the research or writing has been properly cited and credited both in the text and in the Reference List (Bibliography). Contributors are responsible for gaining copyright clearance on figures, photographs or lengthy quotes used in their manuscript that have been published elsewhere.
2. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, or publish it in a book), with proper acknowledgement of the work's initial publication in this journal.
4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access or The Open Access Citation Advantage). Where authors include such a work in an institutional repository or on their website (i.e., a copy of a work which has been published in eTropic, or a pre-print or post-print version of that work), we request that they include a statement that acknowledges the eTropic publication including the name of the journal, the volume number and a web-link to the journal item.
5. Authors should be aware that the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License permits readers to share (copy and redistribute the work in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the work) for any purpose, even commercially, provided they also give appropriate credit to the work, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. They may do these things in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests you or your publisher endorses their use.